Strong G4571σέ

σύ [ῠ],
tu: pronom de la deuxième personne:—dialecte épique nominatif τύνη [ῡ] [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.485, +others)] (dialecte laconien τούνη [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus))]; dialecte éolien σύ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Papyrus fragments” in E. Diehl, 16.6, 21.9)]; dialecte dorien τύ [ῠ] [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.85, 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 34, +others, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 3.33, etc.)]; dialecte béotien τού [syllabe brève] [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica “Supp.” 2.83, 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)] (également τούν [Refs ([prev. work] 50.27, 55.6): Nom.)]σύ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 18.31, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Agamemnon” 1035, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 29, etc.; _vocatif_, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.193, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 165, “Pl.” 1069.)]—Gén. σοῦ, [Refs (“Hymni Homerici” 29.4)], ailleurs seulement dialecte attique, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 302, etc.)]; enclitique σου, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 761, “OT” 538, etc.; jamais chez 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, qui emploie σεῦ, lignes 3.206, +others, σέο [prev. work] 446, +others)] (également dans la poésie lyrique, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus (?)in “PLit.Lond.” 54, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 3.65), σεῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 3.137, +others; également σέθεν 1.180, +others)] (qui se rencontre également dans la poésie lyrique, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 33, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.9, et Trag., 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Septem contra Thebas” 264, +others))], et comme enclitique σευ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.811, +others, σεο 1.396: 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus n’a que σέο 1.124)], σεο (enclitique) [Refs ([prev. work] 9, σεῦ [prev. passage], 3.42, 85, 7.38,)] σευ (enclitique) [Refs (3.36, 134, 7.49)]:—dialecte dorien τεῦ, τευ, [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.19, 10.36, etc.)]; rarement τέο, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 17; forme allongée τεοῦ 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 145, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 84, et τεοῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 8.37, 468)]; dialecte béotien τεῦς [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 24)]; dialecte dorien τεοῦς [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 59; également τιοῦς 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 74.27; τεῦς 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.126)]; variante τοι dans [Refs ([prev. author] 7.25)]; enclitique τεος [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 83; dialecte Crétois τέορ 5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; d’autres formes doriennes sont τίω, τίως, toutes deux [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13, τίος 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 75.24.)]—Dat. σοί, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.158, 167, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 88, 6th c.BC: Mimnermus Lyricus 8, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 7,99, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 3, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, 6.86.ά, 7.52)], etc.; dialecte dorien τοί [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 86 (oxytone))]; dialecte dorien, lesbien, et dialecte ionien enclitique τοι[Refs 8th c.BC+ (Alem. 33, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Frr.” 2.2,8, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 79, 6th c.BC: Hipponax Iambographus 20, 6th c.BC: Anacreon Lyricus 44, 75.3, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “N.” 3.76, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.104, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.115, 3.35, 63, 85; chez 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)], dans la poésie lyrique lesbienne, et dialecte ionien dans la poésie lyrique et la prose, τοι est toujours enclitique, σοί jamais enclitique (τοί et σοι ne se rencontrent pas, sauf σοι [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 3.359, 11.381, ς (οι) 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170)], et dans les codex de [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 4.270, 9.55)]; plus rare que τοι dans [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus, 3.69, +others))]; en dialecte attique σοί et σοι (enclitique) sont tous deux employés (σοί [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 361, etc., σοι [prev. work] 87, etc.))], τοί et τοι ne sont pas employés; σοι n’est jamais élidé, sauf dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170, τοι est élidé dans 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.60, 347, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 55, [prev. author] “Oxy.” 1788 “fragment” 15 ii 9, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 28.2)]; dialecte épique et aussi dans la poésie lyrique τεΐν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 11.201, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.619, épigramme citée dans 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.60, 61, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 930)]; également τίν [ῐ], [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 16, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 1.29, 8.68 (lecture incertaine))]; τίν [ῑ], [Refs 3rd c.BC+ ([prev. author] “I.” 6(5).4, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.20 (τίν)] devant une consonne, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 10(11).93); également τεΐ 7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 53; τίνη 3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13.)]—Acc. σέ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.256, +others)]; enclitique σε,[Refs 7th c.BC+ (1.26, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 1.2, “Supp.” 23.9, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, etc.)]; en grec tardif σέν, [Refs (“Anatolian Studies” p.76)]; dialecte dorien τέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 52, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.48, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.5, 3rd c.BC: Callimachus Epicus “Fragmenta” 114)]; variante τ᾽ (codex R) dans [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 779 (sur l’accent, voir 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 54.14, 83.4))]; τρέ (à lire τϝέ) [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; ou (enclitique) τυ [Refs 6th c.BC+ (“IG” 42(1).121.69 (Epid., 4th c.BC), 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Equites” 1225, “Ach.” 730 (incertain dans “Ach.” 779), 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.56, 78, etc.:—également τίν 6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 4, 3rd c.BC: Cercidas Iambographus 7.6, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 11.39, 55, 68.)]
2 en combinaison avec γε, σύ γε, σέ γε, etc. (comparer ἔγωγε), toi du moins, pour ta part, fréquemment dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)] et dialecte attique; dialecte dorien τύγε [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus [272], 5th c.BC: Timocreon Lyricus 1 (variante{τύ γα}); τύγᾰ 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.69, 71)]; dialecte béotien τούγα [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)]: datif σοί γε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.557)]: accusatif σέ γε [Refs (10.96)], etc.:—également σύ περ [Refs (24.398.)]
3 σύ avec infinitif (comme impératif), [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.134, 4.163.)]
II Duel nominatif et accusatif σφῶϊ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.336, 4.286, +others)], vous deux, tous les deux; σφώ (et non σφῴ,[Refs 8th c.BC+ (comparer 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 85.17), 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.574, 11.782, 13.47, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 344, 1543, etc.)]—Gén. et Dat. σφῶϊν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.341, +others)]; contraction σφῷν une fois dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.62, et toujours en _dialecte attique_ (Hdn.Gr. 1.475) et chez les Trag., p. ex. 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 12, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 342, “OT” 1495, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 892e (les codex de 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus ont σφῶϊν dans “Tht.” 193c, +others, σφῶν “Euthd.” 273e, +others))]. Aucune de ces formes n’est enclitique, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 38.9, 85.12; le codex A de 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 658c, 673e, 689a rend à tort σφῳν)] enclitique; Ζεὺς σφὼ est prescrit dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 15.146 par Hdn.Gr. 2.93.)] —σφῶϊ n’est jamais datif; dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.286)] c’est l’ accusatif dépendant de κελεύ; σφῶϊν n’est jamais accusatif; dans [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 23.52, c’est un datif commodi.)]
III Plur. nominatif ὑμεῖς, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 2.75, +others (devant une voyelle, 4.246, 7.194, +others), 6th c.BC: Pherecydes Syrius Philosophus 11, 3rd c.AD: Democritus Epigrammaticus 29a, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.72, etc.)], vous; dialecte éolien et dialecte épique ὔμμες [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.274, +others, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 24, 25)]; dialecte dorien ὑμές [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 60, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 760, 761, 862; ὑμέν “SIG” 685.118 (Crète, 2nd c.BC), “GDI” 5155.6 ([prev. passage], 2nd c.BC))]; dialecte béotien οὐμές [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 6)]; une forme résolue ὑμέες, [Refs 1st c.BC+ (1st c.BC: Parthenius Mythographus “fragment” 14, est une licence poétique (ainsi 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 93.3))] plutôt qu’une forme ionienne authentique [Refs 5th c.BC+ ((variante dans 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 8.22).)]— Gén. ὑμῶν, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 143, etc.)]; ὑμέων (disyllabe) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 7.159, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 13.7, +others, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 74.6 (ὑμῶν codices), 6th c.BC: Solon Lyricus 11.5 (variante{ὑμῶν}))]; ὑμέων également [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.73, 6.130, +others; comme _trisyllabe_, 3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.27; ὑμείων 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.348, 7.195, +others)]; dialecte dorien ὑμέων [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 46)]; également ὑμῶν, [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 95.23)]; dialecte éolien ὑμμέων [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 96)]; dialecte béotien οὐμίων [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 22.)]—Dat. ὑμῖν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.46, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, etc.)]; dialecte ionien enclitique ὗμῐν [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 97.28,)] également dialecte dorien, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 91)]; dialecte dorien (non enclitique) ὑμίν [ῐ] [Refs ([prev. author] 92)]; ὑμίν [ῐ] également dans [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 864, 1242, “OT” 991, 1402, “Ant.” 308, “El.” 804, +others (mais ὗμιν)] devrait peut-être être rétabli là où le sens exige un enclitique, selon le principe énoncé par [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 35.6, 36.5, “Synt.” 130.23))]; ὕμιν[Refs 8th c.BC+ ((comme _enclitique_) est prescrit par Hdn.Gr. (2.124) dans 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 24.33, par “Etymologicum Magnum” 432.34 dans 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.376, 2.141, etc.:—_dialecte éolien_ et _dialecte épique_ ὔμμῐ, ὔμμῐν, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.316, 11.336, +others, 8th-7th c.BC: Hesiodus Epicus “Scutum Herculis” 328, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 14, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus “Supp.” 26.9, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 11(10).17.)]—Acc. ὑμᾶς, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 325)], etc. (-υ [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.AD: Orphica “Argonautica” 820, variante dans 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 222)]; ὗμας ou (plus probablement) ὕμας est requis par le mètre dans [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Babrius Fabularum Scriptor 9.9, 47.11))]; dialecte ionien ὑμέας (disyllabe) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.198, +others)]; enclitique ὕμεας (disyllabe) [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.60 (Papyrus))]; ὑμέας également [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, +others)]; dialecte éolien et dialecte épique ὔμμε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 23.412, +others, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “I.” 6(5).19; également dans 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Eumenides” 620 (trimètre), et 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 846 (poésie lyrique))]; dialecte dorien ὑμέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 3, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 52, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 737, “Lys.” 1076, “SIG” 528.3 (dialogue Crétois, 3rd c.BC), 622 B 8 (Crétois, 2nd c.BC).)]—Le pluriel est parfois employé lorsqu’on s’adresse à une seule personne, lorsque d’autres sont incluses dans la pensée du locuteur, par exemple [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 12.81, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 89. (Avec σύ)] ; comparer le latin tu, le gothique pu; pour τοι, comparer le sanskrit : génitif et datif te; l’origine de σφῶϊ est douteuse; avec ὑμεῖς, comparer le sanskrit à l’ accusatif pluriel yusmān.)