Strong G5209ὑμᾶς
you
- Transliteration
- humas
- Pronunciation
- hoo-mas'
- Morphology
- Greek morphology unspecified
Definition
Accusative of G5210; you (as the object of a verb or preposition): - ye you (+ -ward) your (+ own).
Detailed definition
αὐτός, -ή, -ό,
determinative pron., in late Gk. much more frequently than in cl. (WM, 178f.; Jannaris, HGG, §1399).
1. Emphatic (so always in nom. exc. when preceded by the art., see infr., iii);
__(1) self (ipse), expressing opposition, distinction, exclusion, etc., αὐ. ἐκχυθήσεται, Luk.5:37; αὐ. ἐγινώσκεν, Jhn.2:25; αὐ.ὑμεῖς, Jhn.3:28; καὶ αὐ. ἐγώ, Rom.15:14; αὐ. Ἰησοῦς, Jhn.2:24; αὐ. καὶ οἱ μετ᾽ αὐτοῦ, Mrk.2:25; ὑμεῖς αὐ., Mrk.6:31; esp. (as freq in cl.) αὐ. ὁ, Mat.3:4, Mrk.6:17, Jhn.16:27, 1Th.3:11, al.; in late Gk., sometimes weakened, ἐν αὐτῇ τ. ὥρᾳ, in that hour, Luk.10:21 (M, Pr., 91; MM, see word);
__(2) emphatic, he, she, it (M, Pr., 86; Bl., §48, 1, 2, 7), Mat.1:21, 12:50, Luk.6:35, al.; pointing to some one as master (cl.), Mat.8:24, Mrk.4:38, al.; αὐ., καὶ αὐ. = οὗτος, ὁ δε (BL, §48, 1), Mat.14:2, Mrk.14:15, 44, Luk.1:22, 2:28, al.
2. In oblique cases (cl.), for the simple pron. of 3rd of person(s), he, she, it, Mat.7:9, 10:12, 26:44, al.; with ptcp. in genitive absol., Mat.9:18, Mrk.13:1, al. (for irreg. constructions, V. Bl., §74, 5); pleonastically after the relative (cf. Heb. אֲשֶׁר לוֹ; WM, 184ff.; Bl., §50, 4; MM, see word), Mrk.7:25, Rev.3:8, 7:2, al.; in constr. ad sensum, without proper subject expressly indicated, Mat.4:23, Act.8:5, 2Co.2:13, al.; genitive αὐτοῦ = ἐκείνου, Rom.11:11, 1Th.2:19, Tit.3:5, Heb.2:4.
3. ὁ, ἡ, τὸ αὐ., the same: Heb.1:12, 13:8; τὸ αὐ., ποιεῖν, Mat.5:46, 47, al.; φρονεῖν, Rom.12:16, 15:5, Php.2:2, al.; τὰ αὐ., Act.15:27, Rom.2:1, al.; κατὰ τὸ (τὰ) αὐ. (MM, see word), Act.14:1, Luk.6:23, al.; ἐπὶ τὸ αὐ., together (MM, see word), Mat.22:34, Act.1:15, al.; ἓν κ. τὸ αὐ., 1Co.11:5, 12:11; with dative (cl.), 1Co.11:5; with a noun, λόγος, Mrk.14:39; μέτρος, Php.1:30; πνεῦμα, 1Co.12:4.
(AS)
determinative pron., in late Gk. much more frequently than in cl. (WM, 178f.; Jannaris, HGG, §1399).
1. Emphatic (so always in nom. exc. when preceded by the art., see infr., iii);
__(1) self (ipse), expressing opposition, distinction, exclusion, etc., αὐ. ἐκχυθήσεται, Luk.5:37; αὐ. ἐγινώσκεν, Jhn.2:25; αὐ.ὑμεῖς, Jhn.3:28; καὶ αὐ. ἐγώ, Rom.15:14; αὐ. Ἰησοῦς, Jhn.2:24; αὐ. καὶ οἱ μετ᾽ αὐτοῦ, Mrk.2:25; ὑμεῖς αὐ., Mrk.6:31; esp. (as freq in cl.) αὐ. ὁ, Mat.3:4, Mrk.6:17, Jhn.16:27, 1Th.3:11, al.; in late Gk., sometimes weakened, ἐν αὐτῇ τ. ὥρᾳ, in that hour, Luk.10:21 (M, Pr., 91; MM, see word);
__(2) emphatic, he, she, it (M, Pr., 86; Bl., §48, 1, 2, 7), Mat.1:21, 12:50, Luk.6:35, al.; pointing to some one as master (cl.), Mat.8:24, Mrk.4:38, al.; αὐ., καὶ αὐ. = οὗτος, ὁ δε (BL, §48, 1), Mat.14:2, Mrk.14:15, 44, Luk.1:22, 2:28, al.
2. In oblique cases (cl.), for the simple pron. of 3rd of person(s), he, she, it, Mat.7:9, 10:12, 26:44, al.; with ptcp. in genitive absol., Mat.9:18, Mrk.13:1, al. (for irreg. constructions, V. Bl., §74, 5); pleonastically after the relative (cf. Heb. אֲשֶׁר לוֹ; WM, 184ff.; Bl., §50, 4; MM, see word), Mrk.7:25, Rev.3:8, 7:2, al.; in constr. ad sensum, without proper subject expressly indicated, Mat.4:23, Act.8:5, 2Co.2:13, al.; genitive αὐτοῦ = ἐκείνου, Rom.11:11, 1Th.2:19, Tit.3:5, Heb.2:4.
3. ὁ, ἡ, τὸ αὐ., the same: Heb.1:12, 13:8; τὸ αὐ., ποιεῖν, Mat.5:46, 47, al.; φρονεῖν, Rom.12:16, 15:5, Php.2:2, al.; τὰ αὐ., Act.15:27, Rom.2:1, al.; κατὰ τὸ (τὰ) αὐ. (MM, see word), Act.14:1, Luk.6:23, al.; ἐπὶ τὸ αὐ., together (MM, see word), Mat.22:34, Act.1:15, al.; ἓν κ. τὸ αὐ., 1Co.11:5, 12:11; with dative (cl.), 1Co.11:5; with a noun, λόγος, Mrk.14:39; μέτρος, Php.1:30; πνεῦμα, 1Co.12:4.
(AS)
Related words
Detailed Greek dictionary
σύ [ῠ],
thou: pronoun of the second person:—Epic dialect nominative τύνη [ῡ] [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.485, +others)] (Laconian dialect τούνη [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus))]; Aeolic dialect σύ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Papyrus fragments” in E. Diehl, 16.6, 21.9)]; Doric dialect τύ [ῠ] [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.85, 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 34, +others, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 3.33, etc.)]; Boeotian dialect τού [short syllable] [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica “Supp.” 2.83, 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)] (also τούν [Refs ([prev. work] 50.27, 55.6): Nom.)]σύ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 18.31, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Agamemnon” 1035, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 29, etc.; _vocative_, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.193, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 165, “Pl.” 1069.)]—Gen. σοῦ, [Refs (“Hymni Homerici” 29.4)], elsewhere only Attic dialect, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 302, etc.)]; enclitic σου, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 761, “OT” 538, etc.; never in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, who uses σεῦ, lines 3.206, +others, σέο [prev. work] 446, +others)] (also in Lyric poetry, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus (?)in “PLit.Lond.” 54, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 3.65), σεῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 3.137, +others; also σέθεν 1.180, +others)] (which also occurs in Lyric poetry, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 33, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.9, and Trag., 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Septem contra Thebas” 264, +others))], and as enclitic σευ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.811, +others, σεο 1.396: 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus has only σέο 1.124)], σεο (enclitic) [Refs ([prev. work] 9, σεῦ [prev. passage], 3.42, 85, 7.38,)] σευ (enclitic) [Refs (3.36, 134, 7.49)]:—Doric dialect τεῦ, τευ, [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.19, 10.36, etc.)]; rarely τέο, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 17; lengthened τεοῦ 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 145, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 84, and τεοῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 8.37, 468)]; Boeotian dialect τεῦς [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 24)]; Doric dialect τεοῦς [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 59; also τιοῦς 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 74.27; τεῦς 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.126)]; τοι variant in [Refs ([prev. author] 7.25)]; enclitic τεος [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 83; Cretan dialect τέορ 5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; other Doric dialect forms are τίω, τίως, both [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13, τίος 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 75.24.)]—Dat. σοί, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.158, 167, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 88, 6th c.BC: Mimnermus Lyricus 8, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 7,99, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 3, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, 6.86.ά, 7.52)], etc.; Doric dialect τοί [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 86 (oxytone))]; Doric dialect, Lesb., and Ionic dialect enclitic τοι[Refs 8th c.BC+ (Alem. 33, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Frr.” 2.2,8, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 79, 6th c.BC: Hipponax Iambographus 20, 6th c.BC: Anacreon Lyricus 44, 75.3, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “N.” 3.76, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.104, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.115, 3.35, 63, 85; in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)], Lesbian Lyric poetry, and Ionic dialect Lyric poetry and Prose τοι is always enclitic, σοί never enclitic (τοί and σοι are not found except σοι [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 3.359, 11.381, ς (οι) 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170)], and in codices of [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 4.270, 9.55)]; rarer than τοι in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus, 3.69, +others))]; in Attic dialect both σοί and σοι (enclitic) are used (σοί [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 361, etc., σοι [prev. work] 87, etc.))], τοί and τοι are not used; σοι is never elided except in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170, τοι is elided in 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.60, 347, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 55, [prev. author] “Oxy.” 1788 “fragment” 15 ii 9, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 28.2)]; Epic dialect and Lyric poetry also τεΐν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 11.201, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.619, epigram cited in 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.60, 61, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 930)]; also τίν [ῐ], [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 16, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 1.29, 8.68 (uncertain reading))]; τίν [ῑ], [Refs 3rd c.BC+ ([prev. author] “I.” 6(5).4, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.20 (τίν)] before a consonant, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 10(11).93); also τεΐ 7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 53; τίνη 3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13.)]—Acc. σέ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.256, +others)]; enclitic σε,[Refs 7th c.BC+ (1.26, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 1.2, “Supp.” 23.9, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, etc.)]; in late Gr. σέν, [Refs (“Anatolian Studies” p.76)]; Doric dialect τέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 52, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.48, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.5, 3rd c.BC: Callimachus Epicus “Fragmenta” 114)]; τ᾽ variant (codex R) in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 779 (on the accent see 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 54.14, 83.4))]; τρέ (to be read τϝέ) [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; or (enclitic) τυ [Refs 6th c.BC+ (“IG” 42(1).121.69 (Epid., 4th c.BC), 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Equites” 1225, “Ach.” 730 (uncertain in “Ach.” 779), 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.56, 78, etc.:—also τίν 6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 4, 3rd c.BC: Cercidas Iambographus 7.6, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 11.39, 55, 68.)]
2 in combination with γε, σύ γε, σέ γε, etc. (compare ἔγωγε), thou at least, for thy part, frequently in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)] and Attic dialect; Doric dialect τύγε [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus [272], 5th c.BC: Timocreon Lyricus 1 (variant{τύ γα}); τύγᾰ 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.69, 71)]; Boeotian dialect τούγα [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)]: dative σοί γε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.557)]: accusative σέ γε [Refs (10.96)], etc.:—also σύ περ [Refs (24.398.)]
3 σύ with infinitive (as imperative), [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.134, 4.163.)]
II Dual nominative and accusative σφῶϊ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.336, 4.286, +others)], you two, both of you; σφώ (not σφῴ,[Refs 8th c.BC+ (compare 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 85.17), 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.574, 11.782, 13.47, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 344, 1543, etc.)]—Gen. and Dat. σφῶϊν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.341, +others)]; contraction σφῷν once in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.62, and always in _Attic dialect_ (Hdn.Gr. 1.475) and Trag., e.g. 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 12, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 342, “OT” 1495, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 892e (codices 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus have σφῶϊν in “Tht.” 193c, +others, σφῶν “Euthd.” 273e, +others))]. None of these forms are enclitic, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 38.9, 85.12; codex A of 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 658c, 673e, 689a wrongly makes σφῳν)] enclitic; Ζεὺς σφὼ is prescribed in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 15.146 by Hdn.Gr. 2.93.)] —σφῶϊ is never dative; in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.286)] it is the accusative depending on κελεύ; σφῶϊν is never accusative; in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 23.52 it is dative commodi.)]
III Plur. nominative ὑμεῖς, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 2.75, +others (before a vowel, 4.246, 7.194, +others), 6th c.BC: Pherecydes Syrius Philosophus 11, 3rd c.AD: Democritus Epigrammaticus 29a, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.72, etc.)], ye, you; Aeolic dialect and Epic dialect ὔμμες [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.274, +others, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 24, 25)]; Doric dialect ὑμές [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 60, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 760, 761, 862; ὑμέν “SIG” 685.118 (Crete, 2nd c.BC), “GDI” 5155.6 ([prev. passage], 2nd c.BC))]; Boeotian dialect οὐμές [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 6)]; a resolved form ὑμέες, [Refs 1st c.BC+ (1st c.BC: Parthenius Mythographus “fragment” 14, is a poeticlicence (so 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 93.3))] rather than genuine Ionic [Refs 5th c.BC+ ((variant in 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 8.22).)]— Gen. ὑμῶν, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 143, etc.)]; ὑμέων (disyllable) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 7.159, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 13.7, +others, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 74.6 (ὑμῶν codices), 6th c.BC: Solon Lyricus 11.5 (variant{ὑμῶν}))]; ὑμέων also [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.73, 6.130, +others; as _trisyllable_, 3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.27; ὑμείων 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.348, 7.195, +others)]; Doric dialect ὑμέων [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 46)]; also ὑμῶν, [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 95.23)]; Aeolic dialect ὑμμέων [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 96)]; Boeotian dialect οὐμίων [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 22.)]—Dat. ὑμῖν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.46, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, etc.)]; Ionic dialect enclitic ὗμῐν [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 97.28,)] also Doric dialect, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 91)]; Doric dialect (not enclitic) ὑμίν [ῐ] [Refs ([prev. author] 92)]; ὑμίν [ῐ] also in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 864, 1242, “OT” 991, 1402, “Ant.” 308, “El.” 804, +others (but ὗμιν)] should perhaps be restored where the sense needs an enclitic on the principle stated by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 35.6, 36.5, “Synt.” 130.23))]; ὕμιν[Refs 8th c.BC+ ((as _enclitic_) is prescribed by Hdn.Gr. (2.124) in 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 24.33, by “Etymologicum Magnum” 432.34 in 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.376, 2.141, etc.:—_Aeolic dialect_ and _Epic dialect_ ὔμμῐ, ὔμμῐν, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.316, 11.336, +others, 8th-7th c.BC: Hesiodus Epicus “Scutum Herculis” 328, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 14, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus “Supp.” 26.9, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 11(10).17.)]—Acc. ὑμᾶς, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 325)], etc. (-υ [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.AD: Orphica “Argonautica” 820, variant in 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 222)]; ὗμας or (more probably) ὕμας is required by the metre in [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Babrius Fabularum Scriptor 9.9, 47.11))]; Ionic dialect ὑμέας (disyllable) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.198, +others)]; enclitic ὕμεας (disyllable) [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.60 (Papyrus))]; ὑμέας also [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, +others)]; Aeolic dialect and Epic dialect ὔμμε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 23.412, +others, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “I.” 6(5).19; also in 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Eumenides” 620 (trimeter), and 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 846 (Lyric poetry))]; Doric dialect ὑμέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 3, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 52, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 737, “Lys.” 1076, “SIG” 528.3 (Cretan dialogue, 3rd c.BC), 622 B 8 (Cretan, 2nd c.BC).)]—The plural is sometimes used in addressing one person, when others are included in the speaker's thought, as [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 12.81, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 89. (With σύ)] cf. Latin tu, Gothic pu; with τοι Sanskrit genitive and dative te; the origin of σφῶϊ is doubtful; with ὑμεῖς cf. Sanskrit accusative plural yusmān.)
thou: pronoun of the second person:—Epic dialect nominative τύνη [ῡ] [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.485, +others)] (Laconian dialect τούνη [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus))]; Aeolic dialect σύ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Papyrus fragments” in E. Diehl, 16.6, 21.9)]; Doric dialect τύ [ῠ] [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.85, 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 34, +others, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 3.33, etc.)]; Boeotian dialect τού [short syllable] [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica “Supp.” 2.83, 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)] (also τούν [Refs ([prev. work] 50.27, 55.6): Nom.)]σύ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 18.31, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Agamemnon” 1035, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 29, etc.; _vocative_, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.193, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 165, “Pl.” 1069.)]—Gen. σοῦ, [Refs (“Hymni Homerici” 29.4)], elsewhere only Attic dialect, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 302, etc.)]; enclitic σου, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 761, “OT” 538, etc.; never in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, who uses σεῦ, lines 3.206, +others, σέο [prev. work] 446, +others)] (also in Lyric poetry, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus (?)in “PLit.Lond.” 54, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 3.65), σεῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 3.137, +others; also σέθεν 1.180, +others)] (which also occurs in Lyric poetry, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 33, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.9, and Trag., 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Septem contra Thebas” 264, +others))], and as enclitic σευ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.811, +others, σεο 1.396: 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus has only σέο 1.124)], σεο (enclitic) [Refs ([prev. work] 9, σεῦ [prev. passage], 3.42, 85, 7.38,)] σευ (enclitic) [Refs (3.36, 134, 7.49)]:—Doric dialect τεῦ, τευ, [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.19, 10.36, etc.)]; rarely τέο, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 17; lengthened τεοῦ 5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus 145, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 84, and τεοῖο 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 8.37, 468)]; Boeotian dialect τεῦς [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 24)]; Doric dialect τεοῦς [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 59; also τιοῦς 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 74.27; τεῦς 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.126)]; τοι variant in [Refs ([prev. author] 7.25)]; enclitic τεος [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 83; Cretan dialect τέορ 5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; other Doric dialect forms are τίω, τίως, both [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13, τίος 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 75.24.)]—Dat. σοί, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.158, 167, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 88, 6th c.BC: Mimnermus Lyricus 8, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 7,99, 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 3, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, 6.86.ά, 7.52)], etc.; Doric dialect τοί [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 86 (oxytone))]; Doric dialect, Lesb., and Ionic dialect enclitic τοι[Refs 8th c.BC+ (Alem. 33, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica “Frr.” 2.2,8, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 79, 6th c.BC: Hipponax Iambographus 20, 6th c.BC: Anacreon Lyricus 44, 75.3, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “N.” 3.76, 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus 10.104, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.115, 3.35, 63, 85; in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)], Lesbian Lyric poetry, and Ionic dialect Lyric poetry and Prose τοι is always enclitic, σοί never enclitic (τοί and σοι are not found except σοι [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 3.359, 11.381, ς (οι) 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170)], and in codices of [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 4.270, 9.55)]; rarer than τοι in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus, 3.69, +others))]; in Attic dialect both σοί and σοι (enclitic) are used (σοί [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 361, etc., σοι [prev. work] 87, etc.))], τοί and τοι are not used; σοι is never elided except in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.170, τοι is elided in 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.60, 347, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 55, [prev. author] “Oxy.” 1788 “fragment” 15 ii 9, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 28.2)]; Epic dialect and Lyric poetry also τεΐν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 11.201, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.619, epigram cited in 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.60, 61, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 930)]; also τίν [ῐ], [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 16, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “P.” 1.29, 8.68 (uncertain reading))]; τίν [ῑ], [Refs 3rd c.BC+ ([prev. author] “I.” 6(5).4, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 2.20 (τίν)] before a consonant, [Refs 7th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 10(11).93); also τεΐ 7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 53; τίνη 3rd c.BC: Rhinthon Comicus 13.)]—Acc. σέ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.256, +others)]; enclitic σε,[Refs 7th c.BC+ (1.26, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 1.2, “Supp.” 23.9, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.42, etc.)]; in late Gr. σέν, [Refs (“Anatolian Studies” p.76)]; Doric dialect τέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 52, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 1.48, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.5, 3rd c.BC: Callimachus Epicus “Fragmenta” 114)]; τ᾽ variant (codex R) in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 779 (on the accent see 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 54.14, 83.4))]; τρέ (to be read τϝέ) [Refs 5th c.AD+ (5th c.AD(?): Hesychius Legal icographus)]; or (enclitic) τυ [Refs 6th c.BC+ (“IG” 42(1).121.69 (Epid., 4th c.BC), 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Equites” 1225, “Ach.” 730 (uncertain in “Ach.” 779), 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 1.56, 78, etc.:—also τίν 6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 4, 3rd c.BC: Cercidas Iambographus 7.6, 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 11.39, 55, 68.)]
2 in combination with γε, σύ γε, σέ γε, etc. (compare ἔγωγε), thou at least, for thy part, frequently in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus)] and Attic dialect; Doric dialect τύγε [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Epicharmus Comicus [272], 5th c.BC: Timocreon Lyricus 1 (variant{τύ γα}); τύγᾰ 3rd c.BC: Theocritus Poeta Bucolicus 5.69, 71)]; Boeotian dialect τούγα [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 55.6)]: dative σοί γε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.557)]: accusative σέ γε [Refs (10.96)], etc.:—also σύ περ [Refs (24.398.)]
3 σύ with infinitive (as imperative), [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.134, 4.163.)]
II Dual nominative and accusative σφῶϊ, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.336, 4.286, +others)], you two, both of you; σφώ (not σφῴ,[Refs 8th c.BC+ (compare 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 85.17), 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.574, 11.782, 13.47, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 344, 1543, etc.)]—Gen. and Dat. σφῶϊν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.341, +others)]; contraction σφῷν once in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 4.62, and always in _Attic dialect_ (Hdn.Gr. 1.475) and Trag., e.g. 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Prometheus Vinctus” 12, 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 342, “OT” 1495, 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 892e (codices 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus have σφῶϊν in “Tht.” 193c, +others, σφῶν “Euthd.” 273e, +others))]. None of these forms are enclitic, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 38.9, 85.12; codex A of 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Leges” 658c, 673e, 689a wrongly makes σφῳν)] enclitic; Ζεὺς σφὼ is prescribed in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 15.146 by Hdn.Gr. 2.93.)] —σφῶϊ is never dative; in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.286)] it is the accusative depending on κελεύ; σφῶϊν is never accusative; in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 23.52 it is dative commodi.)]
III Plur. nominative ὑμεῖς, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 2.75, +others (before a vowel, 4.246, 7.194, +others), 6th c.BC: Pherecydes Syrius Philosophus 11, 3rd c.AD: Democritus Epigrammaticus 29a, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.72, etc.)], ye, you; Aeolic dialect and Epic dialect ὔμμες [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.274, +others, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 24, 25)]; Doric dialect ὑμές [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 60, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 760, 761, 862; ὑμέν “SIG” 685.118 (Crete, 2nd c.BC), “GDI” 5155.6 ([prev. passage], 2nd c.BC))]; Boeotian dialect οὐμές [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 6)]; a resolved form ὑμέες, [Refs 1st c.BC+ (1st c.BC: Parthenius Mythographus “fragment” 14, is a poeticlicence (so 2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 93.3))] rather than genuine Ionic [Refs 5th c.BC+ ((variant in 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 8.22).)]— Gen. ὑμῶν, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 143, etc.)]; ὑμέων (disyllable) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 7.159, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 13.7, +others, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 74.6 (ὑμῶν codices), 6th c.BC: Solon Lyricus 11.5 (variant{ὑμῶν}))]; ὑμέων also [Refs 8th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.73, 6.130, +others; as _trisyllable_, 3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.27; ὑμείων 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 4.348, 7.195, +others)]; Doric dialect ὑμέων [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 46)]; also ὑμῶν, [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 95.23)]; Aeolic dialect ὑμμέων [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus 96)]; Boeotian dialect οὐμίων [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Corinna Lyrica 22.)]—Dat. ὑμῖν, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.46, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, etc.)]; Ionic dialect enclitic ὗμῐν [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 97.28,)] also Doric dialect, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 91)]; Doric dialect (not enclitic) ὑμίν [ῐ] [Refs ([prev. author] 92)]; ὑμίν [ῐ] also in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 864, 1242, “OT” 991, 1402, “Ant.” 308, “El.” 804, +others (but ὗμιν)] should perhaps be restored where the sense needs an enclitic on the principle stated by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Apollonius Dyscolus Grammaticus “de Pronominibus;” 35.6, 36.5, “Synt.” 130.23))]; ὕμιν[Refs 8th c.BC+ ((as _enclitic_) is prescribed by Hdn.Gr. (2.124) in 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 24.33, by “Etymologicum Magnum” 432.34 in 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 1.376, 2.141, etc.:—_Aeolic dialect_ and _Epic dialect_ ὔμμῐ, ὔμμῐν, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 2.316, 11.336, +others, 8th-7th c.BC: Hesiodus Epicus “Scutum Herculis” 328, 7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 14, 7th-6th c.BC: Alcaeus Lyricus “Supp.” 26.9, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “O.” 11(10).17.)]—Acc. ὑμᾶς, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 325)], etc. (-υ [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.AD: Orphica “Argonautica” 820, variant in 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 222)]; ὗμας or (more probably) ὕμας is required by the metre in [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Babrius Fabularum Scriptor 9.9, 47.11))]; Ionic dialect ὑμέας (disyllable) [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 21.198, +others)]; enclitic ὕμεας (disyllable) [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Herodas Mimographus 2.60 (Papyrus))]; ὑμέας also [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.126, +others)]; Aeolic dialect and Epic dialect ὔμμε [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 23.412, +others, 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “I.” 6(5).19; also in 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Eumenides” 620 (trimeter), and 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 846 (Lyric poetry))]; Doric dialect ὑμέ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th c.BC: Alcman Lyricus 3, 5th c.BC: Sophron Comicus 52, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Acharnenses” 737, “Lys.” 1076, “SIG” 528.3 (Cretan dialogue, 3rd c.BC), 622 B 8 (Cretan, 2nd c.BC).)]—The plural is sometimes used in addressing one person, when others are included in the speaker's thought, as [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 12.81, 7th c.BC: Archilochus Lyricus 89. (With σύ)] cf. Latin tu, Gothic pu; with τοι Sanskrit genitive and dative te; the origin of σφῶϊ is doubtful; with ὑμεῖς cf. Sanskrit accusative plural yusmān.)