Strong G5207υἱός
son
- Transliteration
- uihos
- Pronunciation
- hwee-os'
- Morphology
- Greek Noun (Masculine)
Definition
Apparently a primary word; a son (sometimes of animals) used very widely of immediate remote or figurative kinship: - child foal son.
Detailed definition
υἱός, -οῦ, ὁ, [in LXX very frequently and nearly always for בֵּן, Gen.4:17, al.; for בַּר, Dan LXX TH 7:13, al.; etc.;],
a son;
1. in the ordinary sense: Mat.10:37, Mrk.9:17, Luk.1:13, al. mult.; omitted with the art. of origin (WM, §30, 3; Bl., §35, 2), τὸν τοῦ Ἰεσσαί, Act.13:22 (LXX); also with genitive anarth. (cl.), Σώπατρος Πύρρου Βεροιαῖος, Act.20:4; with adj., προτότοκος, Luk.2:7; μονογένης, Luk.7:12; opposite to νόθος, Heb.12:8; in a wider sense, of posterity: ὁ υἱ. Δαυΐδ, of the Messiah (cf. Dalman, Words, 316ff.; DCG, ii, 653f.), Mat.22:42, 45 Mrk.12:35, 37 Luk.20:41, 44 al.; υἱοὶ Ἰσραήλ, (cf. υἷες Ἀχαιῶν, Hom., Il., i, 162, al.), Mat.27:9, Act.9:15, al.
2. Metaphorical;
__(a) as belonging to, being connected with or having the quality of that which follows (a usage mainly due to translation from a Semitic original; cf. Deiss., BS, 161ff.; Dalman, Words, 115f.; DCG, ii, 652f.): τ. πονεροῦ (διαβόλου), Mat.13:38, Act.13:10; τ. νυμφῶνος (see: νυμφών), Mat.9:15, Mrk.2:19, al.; τ. φωτός (Lft., Notes, 74), Luk.16:8, Jhn.12:36, 1Th.5:5; τ. εἰρεήμης, Luk.10:6; γεέννης, Mat.23:15; τ. ἀπωλείας, Jhn.17:12, 2Th.2:3; τ. αἰῶνος τούτου, Luk.16:8 20:34; τ. ἀπειθειάς, Eph.2:2 5:6; βροντῆς, Mrk.3:17; τ. ἀναστάσεως, Luk.20:36; παρακλήσεως, Act.4:36; τ. προφητῶν κ. τ. διαθήκης, Act.3:25;
__(b) υἱὸς τ. θεοῦ (cf. Dalman, Words, 268ff.; Deiss., BS, 166f.; DB, iv, 570 ff.; DCG, ii, 654ff.), of men, as partakers of the Divine nature and of the life to come: Mat.5:9, Luk.20:36, Rom.8:14 9:26, al.; υἱοὶ (κ. θυγατέρες) τ. ὑψίστου, Luk.6:35, 2Co.6:18; in an unique sense of Jesus, Mat.4:3 8:29 28:19, Mrk.3:4, Luk.4:41, Jhn.9:35 11:27, al.; ὁ Χριστὸς ὁ υἱ. τ. θεοῦ ζῶντος (τ. εὐλογητοῦ), Mat.16:16, Mrk.14:61;
__(with) (ὁ) υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (in LXX for Heb. בּן אדם, Aram, בּר אנשׁ; cf. Dalman, Words, 234ff.; DB, iv, 579ff.; DCG, ii, 659ff.; Westc., St. John, i, 74ff.; other reff. in Swete, Mk, 2:10), based on the Aram. of Dan.7:13, where the phrase, like the corresponding Heb. (as in Psa.8:5), means a man, one of the species, and indicates the human appearance of the person in question. It is used of the Messiah in Enoch, with 46, §1-4, also in II Est.13:3, 12, al. Our Lord first makes the phrase a title, using the def. art. It seems to combine the ideas of his true humanity and representative character. Exc. in Act.7:56 and (anarth.) Rev.1:13 14:14, it is used of Jesus only by himself: Mat.8:20, Mrk.2:10, Luk.5:24, Jhn.1:52, al.
(AS)
a son;
1. in the ordinary sense: Mat.10:37, Mrk.9:17, Luk.1:13, al. mult.; omitted with the art. of origin (WM, §30, 3; Bl., §35, 2), τὸν τοῦ Ἰεσσαί, Act.13:22 (LXX); also with genitive anarth. (cl.), Σώπατρος Πύρρου Βεροιαῖος, Act.20:4; with adj., προτότοκος, Luk.2:7; μονογένης, Luk.7:12; opposite to νόθος, Heb.12:8; in a wider sense, of posterity: ὁ υἱ. Δαυΐδ, of the Messiah (cf. Dalman, Words, 316ff.; DCG, ii, 653f.), Mat.22:42, 45 Mrk.12:35, 37 Luk.20:41, 44 al.; υἱοὶ Ἰσραήλ, (cf. υἷες Ἀχαιῶν, Hom., Il., i, 162, al.), Mat.27:9, Act.9:15, al.
2. Metaphorical;
__(a) as belonging to, being connected with or having the quality of that which follows (a usage mainly due to translation from a Semitic original; cf. Deiss., BS, 161ff.; Dalman, Words, 115f.; DCG, ii, 652f.): τ. πονεροῦ (διαβόλου), Mat.13:38, Act.13:10; τ. νυμφῶνος (see: νυμφών), Mat.9:15, Mrk.2:19, al.; τ. φωτός (Lft., Notes, 74), Luk.16:8, Jhn.12:36, 1Th.5:5; τ. εἰρεήμης, Luk.10:6; γεέννης, Mat.23:15; τ. ἀπωλείας, Jhn.17:12, 2Th.2:3; τ. αἰῶνος τούτου, Luk.16:8 20:34; τ. ἀπειθειάς, Eph.2:2 5:6; βροντῆς, Mrk.3:17; τ. ἀναστάσεως, Luk.20:36; παρακλήσεως, Act.4:36; τ. προφητῶν κ. τ. διαθήκης, Act.3:25;
__(b) υἱὸς τ. θεοῦ (cf. Dalman, Words, 268ff.; Deiss., BS, 166f.; DB, iv, 570 ff.; DCG, ii, 654ff.), of men, as partakers of the Divine nature and of the life to come: Mat.5:9, Luk.20:36, Rom.8:14 9:26, al.; υἱοὶ (κ. θυγατέρες) τ. ὑψίστου, Luk.6:35, 2Co.6:18; in an unique sense of Jesus, Mat.4:3 8:29 28:19, Mrk.3:4, Luk.4:41, Jhn.9:35 11:27, al.; ὁ Χριστὸς ὁ υἱ. τ. θεοῦ ζῶντος (τ. εὐλογητοῦ), Mat.16:16, Mrk.14:61;
__(with) (ὁ) υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (in LXX for Heb. בּן אדם, Aram, בּר אנשׁ; cf. Dalman, Words, 234ff.; DB, iv, 579ff.; DCG, ii, 659ff.; Westc., St. John, i, 74ff.; other reff. in Swete, Mk, 2:10), based on the Aram. of Dan.7:13, where the phrase, like the corresponding Heb. (as in Psa.8:5), means a man, one of the species, and indicates the human appearance of the person in question. It is used of the Messiah in Enoch, with 46, §1-4, also in II Est.13:3, 12, al. Our Lord first makes the phrase a title, using the def. art. It seems to combine the ideas of his true humanity and representative character. Exc. in Act.7:56 and (anarth.) Rev.1:13 14:14, it is used of Jesus only by himself: Mat.8:20, Mrk.2:10, Luk.5:24, Jhn.1:52, al.
(AS)
In the Bible
Strong G5207 appears in 348 verses of the KJV.
Translated in the KJV by
- son303
- child46
- of2
- the2
- foal1
- for1
- on1
- sake1
- thou1
- to1
First verses
- Matthew 1:1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
- Matthew 1:20But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.
- Matthew 1:21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
- Matthew 1:23Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
- Matthew 1:25And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.
- Matthew 2:15And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.
- Matthew 3:17And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
- Matthew 4:3And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.
- Matthew 4:6And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
- Matthew 5:9Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
- Matthew 5:45That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
- Matthew 7:9Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone?
- Matthew 8:12But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
- Matthew 8:20And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
- Matthew 8:29And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?
- Matthew 9:6But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.
- Matthew 9:15And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? but the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.
- Matthew 9:27And when Jesus departed thence, two blind men followed him, crying, and saying, Thou Son of David, have mercy on us.
- Matthew 10:23But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
- Matthew 10:37He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
Occurrences by book
Related words
Word family
Detailed Greek dictionary
υἱός, ὁ
(written ϝηιός in Ἀρχ. Ἐφ. [Refs 6th c.BC+ (1931.103 (Nemea, 6th c.BC)), declined regular υἱοῦ, υἱῷ, υἱόν, but in _Attic dialect_ Inscrr. only after 4th c.BC (except υἱός “IG” 12.529,530, 598, 625; ὑός [prev. work] 585, 828; ὑόν[prev. work]70.8), and then always so:)] —in earlier _Attic dialect_ and other Inscrr. inflected as a ῠ-stem (like πῆχυς), _nominative_ υἱύς (written huihus)[Refs (Klein “Vasen mit Meister-signaturen” 72 (“Brit.Mus.Cat.” 701) (ὑύς “IG” 12.571, 670, 686; _contraction_ ὕς [prev. work]663); _genitive_ υἱέος (ὑέος “IG” 22.4883))]; dative υἱεῖ: dual υἱεῖ [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Lysias Orator 19.46)], written ηυιε in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (“IG” 12.775 (corrupted to υἱέε in 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 20a codex B), υἱέοιν: _plural_ υἱεῖς (ὑεῖς “IG” 12.115.14, +others), υἱέων, υἱέσι (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 571, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 1001 (_anapaest meter_)), ὑέ[σιν] (“IG” 12.54.14), υἱεῖς (ὑεῖς “IG” 22.1.73): but _genitive_ υἱέως, and _accusative_ υἱέα, υἱέας, which are formed as though from _nominative_ Υἱεύς,)] are rejected by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Phrynichus Atticista 48,49)], Thom.Mag.p.367 R., as not Attic dialect, though the two latter forms are used by later writers (as υἱέα [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Euphorio Epicus 5, 2nd c.AD: Arrianus Historicus “Cynegeticus” 16, ὑέα “IG” 42(1).244.4 (Epid., 2nd c.BC), but υἱέως)] is falsa lectio in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.13, 1st c.AD: Josephus Historicus “Antiquitates Judaicae” 18.2.4, etc.): _dative_ _plural_ υἱεῦσιν)] is mentioned as a form that would be regular by [Refs (12th c.AD: Eustathius Episcopus Thessalonicensis 1348.27:)] —Homer uses _nominative_ υἱός (very frequently); genitive υἱοῦ only in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 22.238)], elsewhere υἱέο; dative υἱέϊ or υἱε; accusative υἱέα [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 13.350 (compare “IGRom.” 4.360.29 (Pergam., hexameters)), elsewhere υἱόν (very frequently))]: plural, nominative υἱέες [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.10, +others, or υἱεῖς 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 15.248, 24.387, 497; _genitive_ υἱῶν 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 21.587, 22.44, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 24.223)]; dative υἱοῖσι (ν) only [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 19.418, υἱάσι (ν) 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.463, +others (never υἱέσι); _accusative_ υἱέας [prev. work] 149, +others:— he also uses the shorter forms, _genitive_ υἷος, υἷι, υἷα, dual υἷε (distinguished from the _vocative_ _sing._ υἱέ by the accent), _plural_ υἷες, υἷα; but these were confined to _Epic dialect_: their accentuation (in which codices agree with Hdn.Gr. 1.409) may preserve a trace of their Aeolic origin (see. below). The declension υἱῆος, υἱῆϊ, υἱῆα, υἱῆες, υἱήεσσι, υἱῆας (like βασιλῆος, etc., as though from υἱεύς))], belongs solely to later Epic dialect poets, as [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Apollonius Rhodius Epicus 2.1093, 1119, 2nd c.BC: Nicander Epicus “fragment” 110, “Anthologia Graeca” 9.23 (Antip.), etc. Dialect Inscrr. have the following archaic forms, _nominative_ υἱύς “IG” 5 (1).720 (_Laconian dialect_), “Leg.Gort.” 12.17)] (υιυις lapis); accusative υἱύν [Refs (“Inscription Olymp.” 30, “Leg.Gort.” 10.15)]; genitive υἱέος [Refs 6th c.BC+ ([prev. work]6.3, “Schwyzer” 105 (Methana, 6th c.BC))]; but υἱοῦ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (“IG” 9(1).867 (Corc., 7th c.BC))]; nominative plural υἱέες [Refs (“Leg.Gort.” 7.25)]; accusative plural υἱύνς [Refs 8th c.BC+ ([prev. work] 4.40, “IG” 12.407 (Cretan dialect or Argive); _dative_ _plural_ υἱάσι “Leg.Gort.” 4.37 (as in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, influenced by θυγατράσι, πατράσι,)] which have ρα = ṛ, cf. Sanskrit pitṛ[snull]u); ὑέεσσι [Refs (“IG” 14.10 (Syrac.))]; υἷος in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (“SIG” 55 (Thessaly, 5th c.BC) is perhaps the _Aeolic dialect_ _genitive_ (ὑός)] is nominative rather than genitive in [Refs 2nd c.BC+ (“IG” 12.828); _accusative_ ὗα “Schwyzer” 625 (Mytil., 2nd-1st c.BC))]; a nominative ὑϊς (scanned - ?~X) [Refs 6th c.BC+ (“IG” 12.472 (Boeotia, 6th c.BC),compare 4th-5th c.BC: Simonides Lyricus 249 (see. below); _nominative_ _plural_ ὗες “IG” 22.3632.24 (hexameters, Eleusis, 2nd c.AD). The initial syllable is both υἱ-and ὑ)]-in Attic dialect Inscrr. down to [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC (e. g. ὑεῖς “IG” 12.115.14, ὑέ[σιν] [prev. work]54.14, ὑόν see above), afterwards ὑ-, but υἱός)] reappears under the Empire; in Plato codex A usually has ὑιος, which is found also in T, codex B always has υἱός, editors restore ὑό; accusative υἱόν is recommended by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Phrynichus Atticista)] [same place]; in Inscrr. of Pergamon, Magnesia, and Delphi, and in non-literary Papyri, ὑός is at all times less common than υἱός:—ὁ υεἱός [Refs (“CIG” “Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum” “Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum” (add.) 3857p; _dative_ υεἱῷ [prev. work]3846z82 (both Phrygia),compare “BCH” 11.471)]:—son, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.366, etc.)]; υἱὸν ποιεῖσθαί τινα to adopt as a son, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 2.28)]; υἱεῖς ἄνδρες grown-up sons, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 25.88: _metaphorically_, Κόρον Ὕβριος υἱόν)] Oracle texts cited in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 8.77)]: rarely of animals, [NT (NT.Matt.21.5.)]
2 periphrastic, υἷες Ἀχαιῶν, for Ἀχαιοί, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.162, +others; compare παῖς 1.3.)]
3 generally, child, and so υἱ. ἄρρην male child, [NT+3rd c.AD+ (NT.Rev. 12.5, “PSI” 9.1039.36 (3rd c.AD).)]
4 frequently in [Refs (LXX in periphrases (Hebraisms with various meanings), υἱὸς ἐτῶν ἑκατόν 100)] years old, [LXX (LXX.Gen.11.10, +others)]; υἱοὶ ἀδικίας [Refs (“2 Ki.” 7.10; υἱοὶ θανατώσεως “1 Ki.” 26.16; υἱοὶ τῶν συμμίζεων)]hostages, [LXX+NT (LXX.2Ki.14.14; so υἱὸς εἰρήνης NT.Luke.10.6.)]
5 in some dialects, including the Ionic dialect Prose of [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus, υἱός is replaced by παῖς: υἱός)] is rare in Trag., [Refs 8th c.BC+ (4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Septem contra Thebas” 609, “fragment” 320, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Orestes” 1689 (_anapaest meter_), +others, and 7 times in 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus: 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus has both words in this sense.)]
6 as a general term of affection, [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (“PGiss.” 68.2 (2nd c.AD), “POxy.” 1219.2 (3rd c.AD))]; υἱέ, an author's address to the reader, [LXX (LXX.Pro.1.8, +others)]
7 δάμου υἱός, υἱὸς πόλεως, Ἑλλάδος, as titles of honour, [Refs 1st c.AD+ (“SIG” 804.10 (Cos, 1st c.AD), 813A,B (Delph., 1st c.AD), 854 (Eleusis, 1st c.AD).)]
8 υἱοὶ ἀνθρώπων sons of men, periphrastic for men (compare above 2,4), [LXX (LXX.Psa.89(90).3)]; οἱ υἱοὶ τῶν ἀ.[LXX+NT (LXX.Gen.11.5, NT.Mark.3.28; υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου)]man, [LXX (LXX.Eze.2.1, 3, +others)]; of the Messiah,[LXX+NT (LXX.Dan.7.13, NT.Rev.14.14)]; used by Jesus of himself, [NT (NT.Matt.8.20, +others)] (by Stephen recalling the words of Jesus, [NT (NT.Act.7.56).)]
9 υἱοὶ Θεοῦ sons of God, implying inheritors of the nature of God [NT (compare(above 4), NT.Matt.5.9, compare 45, NT.Luke.6.35)]; implying participants in the glory of God, [Refs ([prev. work] 20.36.)]
9.b of Jesus, τὸ γεννώμενον κληθήσεται υἱὸς Θεοῦ [Refs ([prev. work] 1.35)]; ὁ Χριστός, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ, [NT (NT.Matt.26.63, cf. NT.John.1.34.)]
9.c Θεοῦ υἱός, = Latin [Refs (“Divi” (i.e. “Caesaris”))] filius, patronymic of Augustus, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (“BGU” 543.3 (1st c.BC), “PTeb.” 382.21 (1st c.BC), “IG” 12(3).174.2 (Epist. ad Cnidios, 5 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator))]. [Hom.sometimes has the first syllable short in nominative, vocative and accusative singular, οὐδὲ Δρύαντος υἱός [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.130; Ἀμφιτρύωνος υἱός 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 11.270; Ποδῆς υἱὸς Ἠετίωνος 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 17.575, compare 590; Ἀνθεμίωνος υἱόν 4.473; Σελάγου υἱόν 5.612; Ἕκτορ, υἱὲ Πριάμοιο 7.47; and Πηλῆος υἱός, Μηκιστῆος υἱός seem to be the better readings in 1.489, 2.566: in these places some other form ought perhaps to be restored, but none of the known forms has a short ῠ: ὑός has ῡ in “IG” 12.585 (6th c.BC), 828 (5th c.BC), 2.2338, 22.4319 (both 4th c.BC))]; Simon. [prev. cited] seems to have used a monosyllable nominative υἷς, and Hdn.Gr. may have read it as ὕις (??), but this is uncertain, as in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (Scholia 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.266 he seems to say that ὕις (υἷις codex))] does not occur.] (Prob. from *sū-yú-s, cf. Sanskrit sūte 'procreate', Tocharian (A-dialogue) se, (B-dialogue) soyä 'son'; different suffix in *sū-nu-s, Sanskrit sūnūs, etc., and in *s[ucaron]-nu-s, O[Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus)] sunu, etc. (all = son); *sūyú- perhaps became *s[ucaron]wyú-, then *suiwú-; υἱός and υἱόν perhaps by dissimilation from υἱύς υἱύν, since the o-stem forms appear first where υ-υ would otherwise be repeated; ὗϊς (ὑΐς) may be another dissimilation; the precise origin of υἷος υἷι υἷες etc. is uncertain.)
(written ϝηιός in Ἀρχ. Ἐφ. [Refs 6th c.BC+ (1931.103 (Nemea, 6th c.BC)), declined regular υἱοῦ, υἱῷ, υἱόν, but in _Attic dialect_ Inscrr. only after 4th c.BC (except υἱός “IG” 12.529,530, 598, 625; ὑός [prev. work] 585, 828; ὑόν[prev. work]70.8), and then always so:)] —in earlier _Attic dialect_ and other Inscrr. inflected as a ῠ-stem (like πῆχυς), _nominative_ υἱύς (written huihus)[Refs (Klein “Vasen mit Meister-signaturen” 72 (“Brit.Mus.Cat.” 701) (ὑύς “IG” 12.571, 670, 686; _contraction_ ὕς [prev. work]663); _genitive_ υἱέος (ὑέος “IG” 22.4883))]; dative υἱεῖ: dual υἱεῖ [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Lysias Orator 19.46)], written ηυιε in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (“IG” 12.775 (corrupted to υἱέε in 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Apologia” 20a codex B), υἱέοιν: _plural_ υἱεῖς (ὑεῖς “IG” 12.115.14, +others), υἱέων, υἱέσι (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Antigone” 571, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 1001 (_anapaest meter_)), ὑέ[σιν] (“IG” 12.54.14), υἱεῖς (ὑεῖς “IG” 22.1.73): but _genitive_ υἱέως, and _accusative_ υἱέα, υἱέας, which are formed as though from _nominative_ Υἱεύς,)] are rejected by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Phrynichus Atticista 48,49)], Thom.Mag.p.367 R., as not Attic dialect, though the two latter forms are used by later writers (as υἱέα [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Euphorio Epicus 5, 2nd c.AD: Arrianus Historicus “Cynegeticus” 16, ὑέα “IG” 42(1).244.4 (Epid., 2nd c.BC), but υἱέως)] is falsa lectio in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 1.13, 1st c.AD: Josephus Historicus “Antiquitates Judaicae” 18.2.4, etc.): _dative_ _plural_ υἱεῦσιν)] is mentioned as a form that would be regular by [Refs (12th c.AD: Eustathius Episcopus Thessalonicensis 1348.27:)] —Homer uses _nominative_ υἱός (very frequently); genitive υἱοῦ only in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 22.238)], elsewhere υἱέο; dative υἱέϊ or υἱε; accusative υἱέα [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 13.350 (compare “IGRom.” 4.360.29 (Pergam., hexameters)), elsewhere υἱόν (very frequently))]: plural, nominative υἱέες [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.10, +others, or υἱεῖς 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 15.248, 24.387, 497; _genitive_ υἱῶν 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 21.587, 22.44, 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 24.223)]; dative υἱοῖσι (ν) only [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 19.418, υἱάσι (ν) 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.463, +others (never υἱέσι); _accusative_ υἱέας [prev. work] 149, +others:— he also uses the shorter forms, _genitive_ υἷος, υἷι, υἷα, dual υἷε (distinguished from the _vocative_ _sing._ υἱέ by the accent), _plural_ υἷες, υἷα; but these were confined to _Epic dialect_: their accentuation (in which codices agree with Hdn.Gr. 1.409) may preserve a trace of their Aeolic origin (see. below). The declension υἱῆος, υἱῆϊ, υἱῆα, υἱῆες, υἱήεσσι, υἱῆας (like βασιλῆος, etc., as though from υἱεύς))], belongs solely to later Epic dialect poets, as [Refs 3rd c.BC+ (3rd c.BC: Apollonius Rhodius Epicus 2.1093, 1119, 2nd c.BC: Nicander Epicus “fragment” 110, “Anthologia Graeca” 9.23 (Antip.), etc. Dialect Inscrr. have the following archaic forms, _nominative_ υἱύς “IG” 5 (1).720 (_Laconian dialect_), “Leg.Gort.” 12.17)] (υιυις lapis); accusative υἱύν [Refs (“Inscription Olymp.” 30, “Leg.Gort.” 10.15)]; genitive υἱέος [Refs 6th c.BC+ ([prev. work]6.3, “Schwyzer” 105 (Methana, 6th c.BC))]; but υἱοῦ [Refs 7th c.BC+ (“IG” 9(1).867 (Corc., 7th c.BC))]; nominative plural υἱέες [Refs (“Leg.Gort.” 7.25)]; accusative plural υἱύνς [Refs 8th c.BC+ ([prev. work] 4.40, “IG” 12.407 (Cretan dialect or Argive); _dative_ _plural_ υἱάσι “Leg.Gort.” 4.37 (as in 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, influenced by θυγατράσι, πατράσι,)] which have ρα = ṛ, cf. Sanskrit pitṛ[snull]u); ὑέεσσι [Refs (“IG” 14.10 (Syrac.))]; υἷος in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (“SIG” 55 (Thessaly, 5th c.BC) is perhaps the _Aeolic dialect_ _genitive_ (ὑός)] is nominative rather than genitive in [Refs 2nd c.BC+ (“IG” 12.828); _accusative_ ὗα “Schwyzer” 625 (Mytil., 2nd-1st c.BC))]; a nominative ὑϊς (scanned - ?~X) [Refs 6th c.BC+ (“IG” 12.472 (Boeotia, 6th c.BC),compare 4th-5th c.BC: Simonides Lyricus 249 (see. below); _nominative_ _plural_ ὗες “IG” 22.3632.24 (hexameters, Eleusis, 2nd c.AD). The initial syllable is both υἱ-and ὑ)]-in Attic dialect Inscrr. down to [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC (e. g. ὑεῖς “IG” 12.115.14, ὑέ[σιν] [prev. work]54.14, ὑόν see above), afterwards ὑ-, but υἱός)] reappears under the Empire; in Plato codex A usually has ὑιος, which is found also in T, codex B always has υἱός, editors restore ὑό; accusative υἱόν is recommended by [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Phrynichus Atticista)] [same place]; in Inscrr. of Pergamon, Magnesia, and Delphi, and in non-literary Papyri, ὑός is at all times less common than υἱός:—ὁ υεἱός [Refs (“CIG” “Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum” “Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum” (add.) 3857p; _dative_ υεἱῷ [prev. work]3846z82 (both Phrygia),compare “BCH” 11.471)]:—son, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.366, etc.)]; υἱὸν ποιεῖσθαί τινα to adopt as a son, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Aeschines Orator 2.28)]; υἱεῖς ἄνδρες grown-up sons, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 25.88: _metaphorically_, Κόρον Ὕβριος υἱόν)] Oracle texts cited in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 8.77)]: rarely of animals, [NT (NT.Matt.21.5.)]
2 periphrastic, υἷες Ἀχαιῶν, for Ἀχαιοί, [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.162, +others; compare παῖς 1.3.)]
3 generally, child, and so υἱ. ἄρρην male child, [NT+3rd c.AD+ (NT.Rev. 12.5, “PSI” 9.1039.36 (3rd c.AD).)]
4 frequently in [Refs (LXX in periphrases (Hebraisms with various meanings), υἱὸς ἐτῶν ἑκατόν 100)] years old, [LXX (LXX.Gen.11.10, +others)]; υἱοὶ ἀδικίας [Refs (“2 Ki.” 7.10; υἱοὶ θανατώσεως “1 Ki.” 26.16; υἱοὶ τῶν συμμίζεων)]hostages, [LXX+NT (LXX.2Ki.14.14; so υἱὸς εἰρήνης NT.Luke.10.6.)]
5 in some dialects, including the Ionic dialect Prose of [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus, υἱός is replaced by παῖς: υἱός)] is rare in Trag., [Refs 8th c.BC+ (4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus “Septem contra Thebas” 609, “fragment” 320, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Orestes” 1689 (_anapaest meter_), +others, and 7 times in 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus: 8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus has both words in this sense.)]
6 as a general term of affection, [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (“PGiss.” 68.2 (2nd c.AD), “POxy.” 1219.2 (3rd c.AD))]; υἱέ, an author's address to the reader, [LXX (LXX.Pro.1.8, +others)]
7 δάμου υἱός, υἱὸς πόλεως, Ἑλλάδος, as titles of honour, [Refs 1st c.AD+ (“SIG” 804.10 (Cos, 1st c.AD), 813A,B (Delph., 1st c.AD), 854 (Eleusis, 1st c.AD).)]
8 υἱοὶ ἀνθρώπων sons of men, periphrastic for men (compare above 2,4), [LXX (LXX.Psa.89(90).3)]; οἱ υἱοὶ τῶν ἀ.[LXX+NT (LXX.Gen.11.5, NT.Mark.3.28; υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου)]man, [LXX (LXX.Eze.2.1, 3, +others)]; of the Messiah,[LXX+NT (LXX.Dan.7.13, NT.Rev.14.14)]; used by Jesus of himself, [NT (NT.Matt.8.20, +others)] (by Stephen recalling the words of Jesus, [NT (NT.Act.7.56).)]
9 υἱοὶ Θεοῦ sons of God, implying inheritors of the nature of God [NT (compare(above 4), NT.Matt.5.9, compare 45, NT.Luke.6.35)]; implying participants in the glory of God, [Refs ([prev. work] 20.36.)]
9.b of Jesus, τὸ γεννώμενον κληθήσεται υἱὸς Θεοῦ [Refs ([prev. work] 1.35)]; ὁ Χριστός, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ, [NT (NT.Matt.26.63, cf. NT.John.1.34.)]
9.c Θεοῦ υἱός, = Latin [Refs (“Divi” (i.e. “Caesaris”))] filius, patronymic of Augustus, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (“BGU” 543.3 (1st c.BC), “PTeb.” 382.21 (1st c.BC), “IG” 12(3).174.2 (Epist. ad Cnidios, 5 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator))]. [Hom.sometimes has the first syllable short in nominative, vocative and accusative singular, οὐδὲ Δρύαντος υἱός [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 6.130; Ἀμφιτρύωνος υἱός 8th c.BC: Odyssea Homerus Epicus “Odyssey” 11.270; Ποδῆς υἱὸς Ἠετίωνος 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 17.575, compare 590; Ἀνθεμίωνος υἱόν 4.473; Σελάγου υἱόν 5.612; Ἕκτορ, υἱὲ Πριάμοιο 7.47; and Πηλῆος υἱός, Μηκιστῆος υἱός seem to be the better readings in 1.489, 2.566: in these places some other form ought perhaps to be restored, but none of the known forms has a short ῠ: ὑός has ῡ in “IG” 12.585 (6th c.BC), 828 (5th c.BC), 2.2338, 22.4319 (both 4th c.BC))]; Simon. [prev. cited] seems to have used a monosyllable nominative υἷς, and Hdn.Gr. may have read it as ὕις (??), but this is uncertain, as in [Refs 8th c.BC+ (Scholia 8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 5.266 he seems to say that ὕις (υἷις codex))] does not occur.] (Prob. from *sū-yú-s, cf. Sanskrit sūte 'procreate', Tocharian (A-dialogue) se, (B-dialogue) soyä 'son'; different suffix in *sū-nu-s, Sanskrit sūnūs, etc., and in *s[ucaron]-nu-s, O[Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus)] sunu, etc. (all = son); *sūyú- perhaps became *s[ucaron]wyú-, then *suiwú-; υἱός and υἱόν perhaps by dissimilation from υἱύς υἱύν, since the o-stem forms appear first where υ-υ would otherwise be repeated; ὗϊς (ὑΐς) may be another dissimilation; the precise origin of υἷος υἷι υἷες etc. is uncertain.)