Strong G3762οὐδείς
none
- Transliteration
- oudeis
- Pronunciation
- oo-dice'
- Morphology
- Greek Adjective
Definition
Detailed definition
οὐδείς, -δεμία, -δέν (also in WH, txt., the Hellenistic forms -θείς, -θέν, Luk.22:35 23:14, Act.15:9 19:27 26:26, 1Co.13:2, 2Co.11:8; cf. BL, §6, 7; M, Pr., 56n, Thackeray, Gr., 58), related to μηδείς as οὐ to μή,
no, no one, none: with nouns, Luk.4:24, Jhn.10:41, Rom.8:1, al.; absol., Mat.6:24, Mrk.3:27, Luk.1:61, Jhn.1:18, Act.18:10, Rom.14:7, al. mult.; with genitive partit., Luk.4:26, Jhn.13:28, al.; neut., οὐδέν, Mat.10:26, al.; id. with genitive partit., Luk.9:36, Act.18:17, al.; οὐδὲν εἰ μή, Mat.5:13, Mrk.9:29, al.; with neg., strengthening the negation, Mrk.15:4, 5 Luk.4:2, Jhn.3:27, al.; adverbially, Act.25:10, Gal.4:12, al.
(AS)
no, no one, none: with nouns, Luk.4:24, Jhn.10:41, Rom.8:1, al.; absol., Mat.6:24, Mrk.3:27, Luk.1:61, Jhn.1:18, Act.18:10, Rom.14:7, al. mult.; with genitive partit., Luk.4:26, Jhn.13:28, al.; neut., οὐδέν, Mat.10:26, al.; id. with genitive partit., Luk.9:36, Act.18:17, al.; οὐδὲν εἰ μή, Mat.5:13, Mrk.9:29, al.; with neg., strengthening the negation, Mrk.15:4, 5 Luk.4:2, Jhn.3:27, al.; adverbially, Act.25:10, Gal.4:12, al.
(AS)
In the Bible
Strong G3762 appears in 224 verses of the KJV.
Translated in the KJV by
- man89
- nothing64
- no28
- none28
- any6
- not3
- at2
- never2
- loss1
- nought1
- ought1
- thing1
First verses
- Matthew 5:13Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
- Matthew 6:24No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
- Matthew 9:16No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.
- Matthew 10:26Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
- Matthew 11:27All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.
- Matthew 17:8And when they had lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only.
- Matthew 17:20And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.
- Matthew 19:17And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
- Matthew 20:7They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.
- Matthew 21:19And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.
- Matthew 22:16And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.
- Matthew 22:46And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.
- Matthew 23:16Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!
- Matthew 23:18And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.
- Matthew 24:36But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
- Matthew 26:62And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
- Matthew 27:12And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.
- Matthew 27:24When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
- Mark 2:21No man also seweth a piece of new cloth on an old garment: else the new piece that filled it up taketh away from the old, and the rent is made worse.
- Mark 2:22And no man putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put into new bottles.
Occurrences by book
Related words
Same identity
Detailed Greek dictionary
οὐδείς,
feminine οὐδεμίᾰ (never nominative accusative -μίη, -μίην, since οὐδεμιῇ is probably in [Refs (Callias Epigrammaticus “Aet.Oxy.” 2080.56)], rarely οὐδ᾽ ἴα [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 69, 2nd c.BC: Moschus Bucolicus 4.40), _neuter_ οὐδέν (declined and accentuated like{εἷς}, μία, ἕν))], not one, i.e. no one, none, used by [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, 8th-7th c.BC: Hesiodus Epicus, and 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus (who prefer οὔτις) only in _neuter_ _nominative_ and _accusative_ οὐδέν)], except in the phrase τὸ ὃν μένος οὐδενὶ εἴκων [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 22.459, +others)]; οὐδείς is found in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus “fragment” 28; but all genders and cases are common in all other writers, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.32, 33, etc.)]: rare in plural, no set of persons or things, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Andocides Orator 1.23 (uncertain conjecture), 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Respublica Lacedaemoniorum” 3.1; πρὸς οὐδένας τῶν Ἑλλήνων 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 18.23 (variant), compare 19.31,66,312, 24.214, 27.7)]; οὐδένων εἰσὶ βελτίους, i.e. οὔ τινων ἄλλων, [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] 2.17 (compare οὐδενὸς βελτίους 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Protagoras” 324d): _dative_ _plural_ οὐδέσιν 2nd c.AD: Pausanias Periegeta 3.24.3; for another sense of the _plural_, see below 11.3.)] —In _Ionic dialect_ the _plural_ is usually οὐδαμοί.
2 οὐ. ὅστις οὐ every one, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.72, etc.)]; οὐδὲν ὅ τι οὐ every, [Refs ([prev. author] 5.97)]; this came to be regarded as one word, so that οὐδείς passed into the same case as ὅστις, οὐδένα ὅντινα οὐ κατέκλασε [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 117d; οὐδενὸς ὅτου οὐ πάντων ἂν.. πατὴρ εἴην [prev. author] “Prt.” 317c, compare 323b; οὐδενὶ ὅτῳ οὐκ ἀποκρινόμενος [prev. author] “Men.” 70c; so οὐ. ὃς οὐχὶ.. ὀνειδιεῖ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Tyrannus” 373; οὐδὲν γὰρ.. οὔτ᾽ αἰσχρὸν οὔτ᾽ ἄτιμόν ἐσθ᾽, ὁποῖον οὐ.. οὐκ ὄπωπ᾽ ἐγώ [prev. author] “Ant.” 4.)]
3 later οὐδὲν ὅ τι without οὐ, = nothing, οὐδὲν ὅ τι παρήσω [Refs 4th c.BC+ (6th c.AD: Agathias Historicus et Epigrammaticus “Praef.” p.137 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator, +others)]
4 ὅστις οὐδείς not one, ἐτεθνήκεσαν δὲ αὐτῶν μὲν ἀμφὶ τοὺς τετρακοσίους, Ρωμαίων δὲ ὅστις οὐδείς [Refs ([prev. author] 5.20.)]
II naught, good for naught, ὦ νῦν μὲν οὐ. αὔριον δ᾽ ὑπέρμεγας [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Equites” 158, compare 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Fragmenta” 187.5)]; τὸ μὲν [γένος ἀνδρῶν] οὐδέν [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “N.” 6.3: frequently in _neuter_, οὐδὲν εἰδώς)] knowing naught, [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Theognis Elegiacus 141, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Fragmenta” 391)]; οὐκ ἄρ᾽ ᾔστην οὐδὲν ἄλλο πλὴν δάκνειν knew nothing save how to.., [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 19)]; οὐδὲν λέγειν to say naught, see at {λέγω} (B) III.6; τὸ οὐδ᾽ οὐδέν the absolute nothing, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Theaetetus” 180a.)]
II.2 in neuter, of persons, οὐδέν εἰμι [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 951, etc.; οὐδὲν εἶ 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ecclesiazusae” 144; πρὸς τὸν οὐδέν 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Phoenissae” 598; τὸ μηδὲν εἰς οὐδὲν ῥέπει [prev. author] “fragment” 532.2; ᾧ ἀνεμέσητον.. οὐδενὶ εἶναι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Theaetetus” 175e.)]
II.3 in plural, οὐδένες ἐόντες ἐν οὐδαμοῖσι ἐοῦσι Ἕλλησι being nobodies, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 9.58; ὄντες οὐδένες 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Andromache” 700, compare “IA” 371)]; ὁ μηδὲν ὢν κἀξ οὐδένων κεκλήσομαι uncertain conjecture in [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] “Ion” 594; οὐ γὰρ ἠξίου τοὺς μηδένας 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 1114.)]
II.4 with Preps., παρ᾽ οὐδὲν εἶναι [Refs ([prev. author] “OT” 983, etc.)]; παρ᾽ οὐδὲν ἄγειν, θέσθαι, [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] “Ant.” 35, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Iphigenia Taurica” 732; δι᾽ οὐδενὸς ποιεῖσθαι 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 584; ἐν οὐδενὸς εἶναι μέρει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 2.18.)]
II.5 τὸ οὐδέν naught, zero, in Arith., [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Nicomachus Gerasenus Mathematicus “Arithmetica Introductio” 2.6)]; used by Democritus as a name for Place, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Aristoteles Philosophus “Fragmenta” 208.)]
III neuter οὐδέν as adverb, not at all, naught, ἄριστον Ἀχαιῶν οὐ. ἔτισεν [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.412, compare 24.370, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.34, 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 8.22, etc.; so οὐδέν τι 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Memorabilia” 1.2.42, etc.; οὐ. τι πάντως 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.65)]: in answers, nothing, never mind, no matter, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Medea” 64, “IT” 781, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 694)]; οὐδέν γε not at all, [Refs ([prev. author] “Av.” 1360, etc.)]; οὐδὲν μᾶλλον, οὐδὲν ἧσσον, οὐδὲν ὕστερος, see at {μάλα} [Refs 4th c.BC+ (11.5, ἥσσων 111, ὕστερος 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus I.)]
III.2 οὐδὲν ἄλλο ἤ, see at {ἄλλος} III. 2.
B REMARKS: the more emphatic and literal sense, not even one, i.e. none whatever, belongs to the full form, οὐδὲ εἷς, οὐδὲ μία, οὐδὲ ἕν, which is never elided, even in Comedy texts (see. [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ranae” 927, “Lys.” 1045 (Lyric poetry), “Pl.” 138, 1115))], but frequently has a Particle inserted between,[Refs 5th c.BC+ (compare οὐδέ 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus — 2nd c.AD: Zenobius Paroemiographus (in “Etymologicum Magnum” 639.17) and others wrongly assume οὐδείς as a _compound_ not of οὐδέ and εἷς, but of οὐ and δείς (which see). (Later οὐθείς, which see))]
feminine οὐδεμίᾰ (never nominative accusative -μίη, -μίην, since οὐδεμιῇ is probably in [Refs (Callias Epigrammaticus “Aet.Oxy.” 2080.56)], rarely οὐδ᾽ ἴα [Refs 7th c.BC+ (7th-6th c.BC: Sappho Lyrica 69, 2nd c.BC: Moschus Bucolicus 4.40), _neuter_ οὐδέν (declined and accentuated like{εἷς}, μία, ἕν))], not one, i.e. no one, none, used by [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Homerus Epicus, 8th-7th c.BC: Hesiodus Epicus, and 5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus (who prefer οὔτις) only in _neuter_ _nominative_ and _accusative_ οὐδέν)], except in the phrase τὸ ὃν μένος οὐδενὶ εἴκων [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 22.459, +others)]; οὐδείς is found in [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus “fragment” 28; but all genders and cases are common in all other writers, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 1.32, 33, etc.)]: rare in plural, no set of persons or things, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Andocides Orator 1.23 (uncertain conjecture), 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Respublica Lacedaemoniorum” 3.1; πρὸς οὐδένας τῶν Ἑλλήνων 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 18.23 (variant), compare 19.31,66,312, 24.214, 27.7)]; οὐδένων εἰσὶ βελτίους, i.e. οὔ τινων ἄλλων, [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] 2.17 (compare οὐδενὸς βελτίους 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Protagoras” 324d): _dative_ _plural_ οὐδέσιν 2nd c.AD: Pausanias Periegeta 3.24.3; for another sense of the _plural_, see below 11.3.)] —In _Ionic dialect_ the _plural_ is usually οὐδαμοί.
2 οὐ. ὅστις οὐ every one, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 3.72, etc.)]; οὐδὲν ὅ τι οὐ every, [Refs ([prev. author] 5.97)]; this came to be regarded as one word, so that οὐδείς passed into the same case as ὅστις, οὐδένα ὅντινα οὐ κατέκλασε [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Phaedo” 117d; οὐδενὸς ὅτου οὐ πάντων ἂν.. πατὴρ εἴην [prev. author] “Prt.” 317c, compare 323b; οὐδενὶ ὅτῳ οὐκ ἀποκρινόμενος [prev. author] “Men.” 70c; so οὐ. ὃς οὐχὶ.. ὀνειδιεῖ 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Tyrannus” 373; οὐδὲν γὰρ.. οὔτ᾽ αἰσχρὸν οὔτ᾽ ἄτιμόν ἐσθ᾽, ὁποῖον οὐ.. οὐκ ὄπωπ᾽ ἐγώ [prev. author] “Ant.” 4.)]
3 later οὐδὲν ὅ τι without οὐ, = nothing, οὐδὲν ὅ τι παρήσω [Refs 4th c.BC+ (6th c.AD: Agathias Historicus et Epigrammaticus “Praef.” p.137 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator, +others)]
4 ὅστις οὐδείς not one, ἐτεθνήκεσαν δὲ αὐτῶν μὲν ἀμφὶ τοὺς τετρακοσίους, Ρωμαίων δὲ ὅστις οὐδείς [Refs ([prev. author] 5.20.)]
II naught, good for naught, ὦ νῦν μὲν οὐ. αὔριον δ᾽ ὑπέρμεγας [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Equites” 158, compare 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Fragmenta” 187.5)]; τὸ μὲν [γένος ἀνδρῶν] οὐδέν [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Pindarus Lyricus “N.” 6.3: frequently in _neuter_, οὐδὲν εἰδώς)] knowing naught, [Refs 6th c.BC+ (6th c.BC: Theognis Elegiacus 141, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Fragmenta” 391)]; οὐκ ἄρ᾽ ᾔστην οὐδὲν ἄλλο πλὴν δάκνειν knew nothing save how to.., [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Aves” 19)]; οὐδὲν λέγειν to say naught, see at {λέγω} (B) III.6; τὸ οὐδ᾽ οὐδέν the absolute nothing, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Theaetetus” 180a.)]
II.2 in neuter, of persons, οὐδέν εἰμι [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Philoctetes” 951, etc.; οὐδὲν εἶ 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ecclesiazusae” 144; πρὸς τὸν οὐδέν 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Phoenissae” 598; τὸ μηδὲν εἰς οὐδὲν ῥέπει [prev. author] “fragment” 532.2; ᾧ ἀνεμέσητον.. οὐδενὶ εἶναι 5th-6th c.BC: Plato Philosophus “Theaetetus” 175e.)]
II.3 in plural, οὐδένες ἐόντες ἐν οὐδαμοῖσι ἐοῦσι Ἕλλησι being nobodies, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 9.58; ὄντες οὐδένες 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Andromache” 700, compare “IA” 371)]; ὁ μηδὲν ὢν κἀξ οὐδένων κεκλήσομαι uncertain conjecture in [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] “Ion” 594; οὐ γὰρ ἠξίου τοὺς μηδένας 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Ajax” 1114.)]
II.4 with Preps., παρ᾽ οὐδὲν εἶναι [Refs ([prev. author] “OT” 983, etc.)]; παρ᾽ οὐδὲν ἄγειν, θέσθαι, [Refs 5th c.BC+ ([prev. author] “Ant.” 35, 5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Iphigenia Taurica” 732; δι᾽ οὐδενὸς ποιεῖσθαι 5th c.BC: Sophocles Tragicus “Oedipus Coloneus” 584; ἐν οὐδενὸς εἶναι μέρει 4th c.BC: Demosthenes Orator 2.18.)]
II.5 τὸ οὐδέν naught, zero, in Arith., [Refs 2nd c.AD+ (2nd c.AD: Nicomachus Gerasenus Mathematicus “Arithmetica Introductio” 2.6)]; used by Democritus as a name for Place, [Refs 4th c.BC+ (4th c.BC: Aristoteles Philosophus “Fragmenta” 208.)]
III neuter οὐδέν as adverb, not at all, naught, ἄριστον Ἀχαιῶν οὐ. ἔτισεν [Refs 8th c.BC+ (8th c.BC: Ilias Homerus Epicus “Illiad” 1.412, compare 24.370, 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.34, 5th c.BC: Thucydides Historicus 8.22, etc.; so οὐδέν τι 5th-6th c.BC: Xenophon Historicus “Memorabilia” 1.2.42, etc.; οὐ. τι πάντως 5th c.BC: Herodotus Historicus 5.65)]: in answers, nothing, never mind, no matter, [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th c.BC: Euripides Tragicus “Medea” 64, “IT” 781, 5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Nubes” 694)]; οὐδέν γε not at all, [Refs ([prev. author] “Av.” 1360, etc.)]; οὐδὲν μᾶλλον, οὐδὲν ἧσσον, οὐδὲν ὕστερος, see at {μάλα} [Refs 4th c.BC+ (11.5, ἥσσων 111, ὕστερος 4th-5th c.BC: Aeschylus Tragicus I.)]
III.2 οὐδὲν ἄλλο ἤ, see at {ἄλλος} III. 2.
B REMARKS: the more emphatic and literal sense, not even one, i.e. none whatever, belongs to the full form, οὐδὲ εἷς, οὐδὲ μία, οὐδὲ ἕν, which is never elided, even in Comedy texts (see. [Refs 5th c.BC+ (5th-6th c.BC: Aristophanes Comicus “Ranae” 927, “Lys.” 1045 (Lyric poetry), “Pl.” 138, 1115))], but frequently has a Particle inserted between,[Refs 5th c.BC+ (compare οὐδέ 5th c.BC: Bacchylides Lyricus — 2nd c.AD: Zenobius Paroemiographus (in “Etymologicum Magnum” 639.17) and others wrongly assume οὐδείς as a _compound_ not of οὐδέ and εἷς, but of οὐ and δείς (which see). (Later οὐθείς, which see))]